Is a typed name a legal signature?
Yes, it can be. Under US law, typing your name is a valid electronic signature when you do it with the intent to sign the document. The method doesn't matter; the intent does. That's also the catch: a name typed at the bottom of an email, or into a box on a form, isn't automatically a signature, and courts have gone both ways depending on what the person meant and what the circumstances show.
Updated November 9, 2026 · 5 min read
On this page
The short answer
- The law accepts typed names. Both the federal ESIGN Act and the state UETA define an electronic signature broadly enough to include a typed name.
- Intent is the test. A typed name is a signature when the person adopted it to sign that record, and not when they were just identifying themselves.
- It's as valid as ink. Where a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies it. A drawn signature isn't legally stronger than a typed one.
- Evidence makes it hold up. A clear signing step, a record of who typed it and a copy of what they signed decide most disputes.
What the law says
The federal ESIGN Act defines an electronic signature as an electronic sound, symbol or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign it (15 U.S.C. § 7006(5)). UETA, adopted by every state except New York, uses nearly the same words in section 2(8), and its section 7(d) adds that if a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law. Letters typed on a keyboard are a symbol, so a typed name fits the definition.
A digital signature using public key encryption technology would qualify as an electronic signature, as would the mere inclusion of one's name as a part of an e-mail message - so long as in each case the signer executed or adopted the symbol with the intent to sign.
The drafters' comment makes the same point from the other side: it may also be shown that the intent wasn't there, in which case the symbol isn't a signature. Their example is a private key used only to unlock something, with no intention to sign. A typed name works the same way.
Intent is the whole test
Nobody can see intent directly, so it's inferred from context. These situations sit at different points on the scale:
| Situation | Shows intent to sign? |
|---|---|
| Typing your name in a field labeled Signature, then pressing a button that says you're signing | Strongly. The whole process exists to sign. |
| Typing "/s/" followed by your name at the end of a document | Usually. The convention exists to mark a signature. |
| Typing "I accept" and your full name in an email replying to a written offer | Possibly. It depends on the deal and what both sides expected. |
| An automatic signature block your email program adds to every message | Weakly. You didn't adopt it for this message. |
| Typing your name into a Name field on a form | Usually not on its own. It identifies you rather than signing. |
What courts have said
Two appellate decisions, both about settlements agreed by email, show how much turns on the facts.
- J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair (Cal. Ct. App. 2014), 232 Cal.App.4th 974. A defendant replied to a settlement proposal by email, accepted it and typed his name at the end. The trial court enforced the deal. The Court of Appeal reversed: the record didn't show he typed his name with any intent to formalize an electronic transaction, or that the parties had agreed to transact electronically, so his printed name wasn't an enforceable electronic signature under California's UETA.
- Forcelli v. Gelco Corp. (N.Y. App. Div. 2013), 109 A.D.3d 244. An insurance claims adjuster emailed the terms of a settlement and ended with her typed name. New York's appellate court held that an email can be a subscribed writing under the state's settlement rule when the sender types their name intending it as a signature, found that intent there, and held the settlement enforceable.
Neither case says typed names are good or bad. Both decided whether this person meant to sign this message, under a specific settlement statute. A dispute over your contract would turn on its own facts and your state's law.
When a typed name isn't enough
- Documents outside the e-signature laws. ESIGN doesn't apply to wills, family law matters and certain notices, and states add their own exclusions. See are electronic signatures legal.
- Documents that need a notary or witnesses. A typed name can't replace a notarization, and witness rules come from the law that requires them. See notarization and witnesses.
- Forms with their own rules. Courts and agencies set signature rules for their own filings. See court documents and tax returns.
- When the other side said it wants a signed original. If both sides expected a formal signing, a typed name in the meantime may not count, which was part of the problem in J.B.B.
How to make a typed signature hold up
- Make the signing step unmistakable. A labeled signature field and a button that states the person is signing leave little room to argue it was just a name.
- Get agreement to sign electronically. UETA applies only between parties who agreed to transact electronically (section 5), so a consent checkbox before signing is worth having.
- Tie the name to a person. UETA section 9 lets attribution be shown in any manner, including the security procedure used: a link sent to their own email, an access code, a record of the device and IP address.
- Keep the exact record. Save the signed version in a form both sides can retrieve and reproduce later, with a log of when it was viewed and signed.
Typed signatures in SignMaster
Signers in SignMaster can draw, type or upload their signature, or take a photo of one. Whichever they choose, they first tick a box agreeing to use electronic records and signatures, and the signing dialog states that by selecting Adopt and sign they agree it's their electronic signature, as binding as one made with pen and paper. The certificate of completion then records each signer's email, IP address, browser and the times they viewed, consented and signed. If you just need a typed signature image for your own document, try the free signature maker.
General information, not legal advice
Whether a particular typed name is a signature is a question of fact, decided under the law of the state involved. The decisions described here are examples, not a rule for your situation, and courts keep adding to them. If a contract you rely on was signed only by a typed name in an email, ask a lawyer how your state treats it.
Questions? Answers.
Is typing your name in an email a legal signature?
It can be, if you typed it intending to sign the message as an agreement. A sign-off typed out of habit, or a signature block added automatically, is much weaker evidence of that intent.
Is a typed signature as valid as a handwritten one?
Legally, yes. Where a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies it under ESIGN and UETA. The difference is evidence: proving who typed a name can need more than proving who signed in ink.
Is /s/ followed by my name a valid signature?
Often, because the convention exists to show intent to sign. Courts and agencies may have their own format rules for filings, so follow those where they apply.
Does a typed signature need to be in a script font?
No. The font is cosmetic. What matters is that you adopted the name to sign the document. A script font doesn't add legal weight.
Can someone else type my name and bind me?
Only if it's attributable to you, for example because you authorized them, as an employee or agent. A typed name someone else entered without authority is a forgery, and attribution evidence is how that's shown.
Sources
- 15 U.S.C. § 7006, ESIGN Act definitions (govinfo) · govinfo.gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 7001, ESIGN Act general rule and consumer consent (govinfo) · govinfo.gov
- Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (1999), final text (Uniform Law Commission) · uniformlaws.org
- Uniform Law Commission, Electronic Transactions Act · uniformlaws.org
- J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair, 232 Cal.App.4th 974 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) (FindLaw) · caselaw.findlaw.com
- Forcelli v. Gelco Corp., 109 A.D.3d 244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2013) (CourtListener) · courtlistener.com
General information, not legal advice. Laws change, and how they apply depends on your situation. For advice about a specific document, talk to a lawyer licensed where you are.
